|
I was in the supermarket yesterday - a local co-op, all business as usual - when I saw an elderly lady collapse. As she fell, her hand, then wrist, caught the edge of a shelving unit (specifically, a protruding metal label holder - Tuna chunks in brine / sunflower oil £3). I rushed to help, as anyone would, making a series of observations within a few steps:
1. This lady was approximately my mother's age (84). 2. She was dressed very smartly - light grey suit jacket, dark grey trim around the collar. 3. The trim on her suit matched the floor tiles. 3. Her face was also grey, desaturated, as if adjusted in Photoshop. 4. Her make-up (much more than my mum would wear) hadn't changed colour. It seemed to sit above the surface of her face. 5. The blood emerging on her hand and wrist - slowly, and thankfully not dangerously - created a visual relationship with the pasta sauce jars on the grey shelf that her hand reached over, upon the grey floor. This was less than seconds. The lady was conscious throughout, impressively dignified and calm. She lay straight as a guard whilst we (two store workers and I) ensured she was okay, comfortable, bandaged and warm (it was cold; the milk section was to the side of us). An ambulance was called - just to be sure - and it then felt appropriate to leave. I edged away from the scene, wondering where in the rush I'd put my tomato soup. I didn't take any photos, but I'd be lying if I said it didn't cross my mind. This is not to say I cared less, acted slower, or wanted to exploit her misfortune; I was just aware that as these events unfolded I noticed things, picturing them photographically. Is that wrong? I hope she is okay. CF
2 Comments
There's a book of accounts like this one of Photographs Not Taken. Occasionally, I give students a blank 6x4 postcard and ask them to describe something as if it was a photograph (that they have not taken). I like to exhibit these pieces of text as if they were photographs. Do photographers see things photographically? If so, what does this mean? Do we see (imaginary) edges around objects and scenes? Do we try to refocus our eyes? Do we pause and look hard at things others would pass over? Sontag (and others) have described the violence of photography - the acquisitive, grasping, invasive quality of the medium and process. Is the way photographers look an act of violence or of wonder? Does it matter whether a photograph is made or not made?
Reply
Bernard Bloom
12/6/2016 04:22:18 pm
I read of an experiment where a computer was set up to read the eye movements of people looking at pictures. There were much more eye movements from photographers who annalised the scene.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
BlogGuest blog posts by members of the photography teaching and learning community. Archives
April 2023
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed